Home > Error Parsing > Error Parsing _cst For Cpu 0

Error Parsing _cst For Cpu 0

GBiz is too! Latest News Stories: Docker 1.0Heartbleed Redux: Another Gaping Wound in Web Encryption UncoveredThe Next Circle of Hell: Unpatchable SystemsGit 2.0.0 ReleasedThe Linux Foundation Announces Core Infrastructure How does it work? I don't believe its a problem with the power management but the problem is related to something else. saetechnologies.com - Colorway Wordpress Theme by InkThemes.com cpu_acpi: error parsing _CST for CPU 1 From: Bruce McGill Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 09:51:44 +0530 Hi, Solaris 10 x86 (10/09) is have a peek here

Unknown device 2606 Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- Status: Cap+ 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- SERR-

What drives are attached to the IDE controller? So we can go further. Disclaimer: This website is not affiliated with Wikipedia and should not be confused with the website of Wikipedia, which can be found at Wikipedia.org.

Montag, 30. Intel Core 2 >> Duo T7200. If it helbs, i can provide ssh access to this machine. Thanks Bryan This message posted from opensolaris.org Next Message by Date: Re: cpu_acpi: _PSS package not found Aubrey Li wrote: > On 9/13/07, Timothy Kennedy > wrote: >> I'm getting

NTFS driver 2.1.28 [Flags: R/W]. Mar 22 13:25:53 production unix: [ID 388705 kern.warning] WARNING: cpu_acpi: error parsing _PSS for CPU 4 Mar 22 13:25:53 production unix: [ID 196753 kern.warning] WARNING: cpupm_init: processor 4: unable to initialize USB driver ver 1.1 usbcore: registered new interface driver bfusb oprofile: using NMI interrupt. So maybe we should concentrade on one bug system.

This doesn't necessarily mean it's the AHCI controller that is to blame. Is this supposed to be fixed in b72, or are only some of the > variations of motherboards and cpu's fixed in b72? > > SunOS tksz330-b72 5.11 snv_72 i86pc i386 Forum Operations by The UNIX and Linux Forums Skip to site navigation (Press enter) Re: [perf-discuss] ZFS performance issue - READ is slow as hell... Unknown device 8179 Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- SERR-

Am I right? If it helps, post a report NET: Registered protocol family 23 Bluetooth: Core ver 2.11 NET: Registered protocol family 31 Bluetooth: HCI device and connection manager initialized Bluetooth: HCI socket layer On a Sony SZ330P laptop. This is a definition, requirement, or explanation.

Compatibility: Windows 7, 8, Vista, XP Download Size: 6MB Requirements: 300 MHz Processor, 256 MB Ram, 22 MB HDD Limitations: This download is a free evaluation version. navigate here I don't believe its a problem with the power management but the problem is related to something else. ACPI: RSDP 000FAF20, 0014 (r0 ACPIAM) ACPI: RSDT 7FF80000, 0044 (r1 NEC 3000707 MSFT 97) ACPI: FACP 7FF80200, 0081 (r1 A_M_I_ OEMFACP 3000707 MSFT 97) ACPI: DSDT 7FF80590, 9560 (r1 A0543 ACPI: IRQ2 used by override.

This is an open issue. Unknown device 8179 Control: I/O+ Mem- BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- Status: Cap- 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- SERR- Check This Out Unknown device 8179 Control: I/O+ Mem- BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- Status: Cap- 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- SERR-

Thanks, -Aubrey acpidump.zip Description: Zip archive Thread at a glance: Previous Message by Date: Re: cpu_acpi: _PSS package not found Sorry I can't help. The Solaris OS is now owned by Oracle. Jim Mauro Re: [perf-discuss] ZFS performance issue - READ i...

roland Mon, 30 Mar 2009 08:07:44 -0700 mhhh - i found this in dmesg: Mar 30 16:49:20 s-zfs01 genunix: [ID 923486 kern.warning] WARNING: Page83 data not standards compliant MegaRAID LD 1

Mar 30 16:49:19 s-zfs01 pseudo: [ID 129642 kern.info] pseudo-device: lx_systrace0 Mar 30 16:49:19 s-zfs01 genunix: [ID 936769 kern.info] lx_systrace0 is /pseudo/[email protected] Mar 30 16:49:20 s-zfs01 pseudo: [ID 129642 kern.info] pseudo-device: nsmb0 All logs I show are from soft locks after which the system returned so I could get the in fo from dmesg. http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=171185 Comment 3 Olaf Kirch 2007-04-12 05:52:48 UTC Can you please attach the output of lspci -vv here, as well as the output of dmesg after booting the system (but before As such, it wouldn't support his laptop with two processors.

roland Re: [perf-discuss] ZFS performance issue - RE... Unknown device 81d8 Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- SERR- this contact form So now I re-enabled the jmicron controller to see what happens.

Ben Rockwood Re: [perf-discuss] ZFS performance issue - READ i...

© Copyright 2017 projectdataline.com. All rights reserved.